<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe Lightroom 1.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xyloid.org/2007/04/18/adobe-lightroom-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xyloid.org/2007/04/18/adobe-lightroom-10/</link>
	<description>The world from a mathematician's perspective</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://xyloid.org/2007/04/18/adobe-lightroom-10/#comment-1792</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xyloid.org/2007/04/18/adobe-lightroom-10/#comment-1792</guid>
		<description>I'd say "good". There's been some quite significant improvements over the beta in terms of organization and the like. It's going to replace Downloader Pro/BreezeBrowser Pro as my tool for organizing photos, and since I don't do a whole load of editing in PS anyway (mainly just RAW settings nowadays) it will probably save me a heap of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say &#8220;good&#8221;. There&#8217;s been some quite significant improvements over the beta in terms of organization and the like. It&#8217;s going to replace Downloader Pro/BreezeBrowser Pro as my tool for organizing photos, and since I don&#8217;t do a whole load of editing in PS anyway (mainly just RAW settings nowadays) it will probably save me a heap of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sayonara</title>
		<link>http://xyloid.org/2007/04/18/adobe-lightroom-10/#comment-1790</link>
		<dc:creator>Sayonara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xyloid.org/2007/04/18/adobe-lightroom-10/#comment-1790</guid>
		<description>Traitor.

Is this "good", or "good compared to the alpha version"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traitor.</p>
<p>Is this &#8220;good&#8221;, or &#8220;good compared to the alpha version&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
